15 Comments
User's avatar
Shelagh Anne Shackleton's avatar

The MRNA covid shots themselves are contaminated with at least 30% D.N.A replication competent plasmids from the manufacturing process, so there is no off switch for the MRNA injections either.

The plasmids contaminating the COVID MRNA shots are replication competent in both Mamalian and bacterial cells.

So they can replicate in the recipients own body cells and also in the commensal bacteria that live in the recipient's gut.

Secondly integration using adenoviral vectors results in nuclear integration about 10% of the time.

Thirdly the Phizzer plasmid contains SV40 which is a nuclear localization signal which transports

D.N.A into the cell nucleus.

Finally all the plasmids contain antibiotic resistance genes conferring antibiotic resistance to the recipient.

In the case of Phizzerr resistance to Neomycin, Kanamycin and Ampicillin.

I think all the gene therapy platforms are not fit for purpose and should be banned for use in the general population and optional for those with genetic disorders.

They should never be mandatory

Expand full comment
Miss Parker's avatar

Good points all, but never being mandatory is truly insufficient, if these "gene therapy" platforms allow or promote shedding that will transfect other people and animals. Surely, less toxic therapies are needed for those with genetic disorders, cancer, or whatever, so that these patients can't unknowingly harm others who, in turn, could also transfect those in their environments.

Expand full comment
Skidmark's avatar

Exactly. The injected ones cannot be salvaged, but something has to be done about shedding.

Expand full comment
Miss Parker's avatar

It took me a calendar and a year to realize I had been shed upon, correlating my sudden attacks of symptoms with my husband's Pfizer shots (doctor talked him into them) and with his returns from travels through airports and big audience events. Those shots appear to be reactivated around crowds likely partially comprised of newly jabbed and boosted shedders.

It occurs to me the fact of shedding is often denied or underplayed because most people with health effects from exposure to others' vaccines don't realize the source of their problems, and certainly their doctors never mention the dangers of shedding. Known a few people who rode in cars with vaccinated friends and then had cardiac and neurological episodes, and so they figured it out fairly quickly.

Expand full comment
Susie8888's avatar

No, it's not science - it's premeditated murder. Continuous replication within the cells will eventually "burst" the host

Expand full comment
Decision Junction's avatar

💯

Expand full comment
mejbcart's avatar

just wanted to add few cents to this great summary, here from:

https://www.cell.com/molecular-therapy-family/molecular-therapy/fulltext/S1525-0016(16)30267-2

by those who are telling us we stem from apes (despite of some being still around), so why not to go full speed to eliminate innate immunity for good, you are 'open' to anything toxic, foreign, not noticing how your body is changing.. well, question is, towards WHAT? Btw. when you read the patents from ARCTURUS at: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/83/1a/f7/4d436622a54a5b/WO2023010128A2.pdf under title ‘RNA vaccines’, and read what types of RNA they are using, it appears the same types as in the covid MOD-E-RNA/Pfizer shots, N1-modified pseudouridine, among many others, most FOREIGN to human body. I tried to find ANY information about degradation pathway of those synthetics, so far, futile. Thus will those SYNTHETIC nucleotides ever leave the human body??? From what we hear about 2-3 years, maybe not for now...:

https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/synthetic-modified-mrna-a-new-tomorrow

title:

"Synthetic modified mRNA (mmRNA), a new tomorrow, which never dies..."

Expand full comment
Jomico's avatar

Further evidence that the powers that be only want to be involved in your health right up to the point they put the life changing juice into your bloodstream… the moment the needle comes out .. you are on your own…. No further follow up .. eventually you will end up as an amyloid protein blob inside a body bag.

Remove the liability clause that protects the industry from accountability and culpability… once they are held fully responsible , they will stop this silly behaviour.

Expand full comment
Decision Junction's avatar

Inhumane and Criminal!

Expand full comment
ts1213's avatar

"Remove the liability clause that protects the industry from accountability and culpability"

Doesn't occur because everyone from Big Pharma, tech, banking and even government have ties. This IS an assault on humanity by the forces of evil. This IS WWIII but only not in the manner in which one would envision.

Expand full comment
Miss Parker's avatar

Agree, but we'll still have a hot world war soon enough, according to Albert Pike. Think of all the mandatorily jabbed servicemembers and draftees spreading the shedding tech to civilian populations, similar to the so-called Sapnish flu of over 100 years ago that may have been a toxic and shedding reaction to novel vaccines given to the military, and then civilians, and not a flu at all. The planners like to repeat history because they get away with it.

Depop via toxic "medicine" and war is just one of their goals. According to their numerous patents and papers, the other is to transhumanize survivors into Human2.0 and control them via the "vaccine"-injected nanotech, polymer and graphene operating systems in the sera.

Expand full comment
ts1213's avatar

Hopefully, before all of that, someone bigger than I just crushes this all like a bug in a rug.

Expand full comment
Miss Parker's avatar

Whatever happened to the Jolly Green Giant?

Expand full comment
ts1213's avatar

He is a giant, to say the least. At any rate; I have little control over any of this.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

This research casts light on the dangers of injecting pregnant women.

Amyloidogenic Fibrin Microclotting Following Prenatal mRNA Vaccination Exposure

https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/amyloidogenic-fibrin-microclotting

We report the presence of amyloidogenic fibrils in the peripheral blood of a three-year-old child with documented in-utero exposure to maternal mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/amyloidogenic-fibrils-in-a-post-gestational

Expand full comment